Rather eye opening study here from MIT.
The premise is that site-authentication images increase security because customers will not enter their passwords if they do not see the correct image, said Stuart Schechter, a computer scientist at the M.I.T. Lincoln Laboratory. From the study we learned that the premise is right less than 10 percent of the time.
Source: Study Finds Security Flaws on Web Sites of Major Banks – New York Times
It will be interesting to see the responses of those Banks’ that use PassMark.
My first question is ‘ who commissioned the study?’. This may provide some clues as to where this came from, the motivation, and whether objective or not.
I would add in defense of PassMark (owned by RSA) that the picture validation, is a very small component of the overall security architecture, both within PassMark, and alongside the other security measures Banks’ implement. This survey chooses to deal with on aspect only.
DISCLOSURE: I have no connection with RSA or PassMark. I have worked with them in a vendor relationship, in the past to implement their solutions.

2 thoughts on “MIT/ Harvard study raises questions about use of pictures to visually validate sites to customers”
Comments are closed.