This is not a technology blog, but everyone in the business relies on portability for connection, with laptops, Blackberries etc. So it was with some interest I read last week about the Foleo from Palm, and decided to study it this morning.
Is it just me, or are Palm still operating in 1995 mode? i would safely predict this new device will be a total failure.
It’s an ultracompact computer with a twist. Palm is positioning the sleek clamshell device, which will sell for $499 after a rebate, as an alternative to carrying a larger, conventional laptop. It offers a nearly full-size keyboard, a 10-inch display, and comes with a selection of applications including a word processor and spreadsheet. But Hawkins believes it will be most useful when people also carry smartphones, like Treos or BlackBerrys (RIM), and transfer e-mail to Foleo when they’re in sit-down mode. “It’s a companion to your phone and companion to you,” Hawkins says.
Source: Palm Foleo
The device is tagged as a ‘smartphone companion’. Why would anyone want a smartphone companion? At first I have to admit their positioning sounded like there is no WiFi, but on further investigation, it seems to have WiFi. I love my Blackberry, but if I have my laptop in front of me, that’s what I am using.
So I thought i would run a quick comparison between the new Foleo, and my trusty Thinkpad X60s. This is not a Lenovo ad by the way – i merely seek the ultimate in portability, and wiredness (that’s not weirdness btw). I did not bother with a Macbook Pro comparison, because I cannot imagine any of those users being remotely interested.
Five reasons the Palm Foleo will fail ….
| Foleo | Thinkpad X60s |
| 2.5 lbs/ 1.1 kg | 3.5 lbs/ 1.6 Kg |
| Battery period – 5 hrs | Battery period – 5 hrs |
| Limited software | Office and all software |
| Cost $500 | Cost $2,800 |
| Linux instant on/ solid state memory | Windows or Linux/ 2 gig ram/ 100 gig hd |
The instant on thing is good, although I have the same benefit with ‘sleep mode’. I close the lid and it lasts for hours or days, and pops back on when I open the lid.
Conclusion:
The most compelling feature is the price. But even a starving student will have trouble rationalising the lack of capabilities, and I would assume lack of configurability (non standard Linux) against that cost. The second hand computer stores all stock old corporate thinkpads, and I know one person using an X31 which ran him US $425.
And the weight gain is nominal – about the same as a bottle of water,
If someone could come out with a device that came in less than a kilo, and ran on normal memory, with a full operating system, preferably Linux for the small footprint, for $500 – that might gain some traction.

Test comment
colin-note
colin-note7653