It’s a textbook case of what happens when coercive diplomacy is run through a single mercurial personality rather than institutional architecture.
Follow up to China defies post. Trump spent 65 days oscillating between “they haven’t paid a big enough price” on Saturday and “very positive discussions” on Sunday. That whipsaw signalling — repeated throughout the conflict — has had two compounding effects: It handed China its opening. Beijing read the vacillation correctly: Washington needs a deal for domestic reasons (gas at $4.45, War Powers deadline, GOP fractures, midterm optics) but can’t admit it. The Blocking Rules deployment is precisely calibrated to that weakness — increase Iranian economic resilience at the moment US leverage is already eroding, without firing a shot. It … Continue reading It’s a textbook case of what happens when coercive diplomacy is run through a single mercurial personality rather than institutional architecture.
